Science-based Diplomacy
Comment
Stakeholder Type

Science-based Diplomacy

The “Scientification of Diplomacy” is based on interdisciplinary work between global governance, international relations, international law, computational social sciences, mathematics, optimisation theory and behavioural research. It covers different emerging fields of research, such as Computational diplomacy and Negotiation engineering.

Computational Diplomacy, for one, is concerned with our emerging ability to map the landscape of international relations, to gather and analyse data on unprecedented scales and to simulate potential outcomes. This has transformational potential for diplomatic activity. For instance, efforts have already begun to plot the networks of influence between actors on an international scale and to use artificial intelligence to mine the large databases of texts relating to historical negotiations and international organisations. As such, Computational Diplomacy is revealing not only the complexity of modern international relations but the potential knock-on effects of future actions, giving opportunities to favour the emergence of desired outcomes. It also allows actors to better understand the history of negotiations, how changes in language reveal movements in position and to reduce uncertainty in formulating plans.

Negotiation Engineering, on the other hand, is a solution-oriented approach to negotiation problems that uses quantitative methods in a heuristic way to find an adequate solution. The approach draws on breaking down and formalising the problem(s) at hand and on the heuristic application of mathematical methods such as game theory and mathematical optimisation. In this way, it can contribute to recognising feelings and better managing them during the negotiation process, as well as allowing for resolutions of more complex real-world issues.

Key Takeaways

Researchers from a wide range of academic disciplines are collaborating to improve approaches to diplomacy through applying numerical, computational and other technical forms of understanding. Computational diplomacy, for instance, can exploit existing data to better understand past diplomatic achievements and the network structures that facilitated them. Also of interest is Negotiation engineering, which raises the possibility that future agreements will be informed by computationally derived understanding and will more successfully bring together broader groups of stakeholders in complex negotiations, while allowing progress with fewer missteps. Similarly, Predictive peacebuilding has potential to use machine-learning approaches to increase the chances of achieving greater international stability. Trust and cooperation modelling applies computational approaches to the task of establishing relationships that result in positive experiences of cooperation and collaboration while providing tools for distinguishing trustworthy from untrustworthy potential partners.

Emerging Topic:

Anticipation Potential

Science-based Diplomacy

Sub-Fields:

Computational diplomacy
Negotiation engineering
Predictive Peacebuilding
Trust and Co-operation Modelling
The idea of applying computational approaches to diplomacy is still relatively new. This is reflected in the uniformly low awareness found across the four key domains investigated. These approaches are not expected to become mainstream for another 10-20 years and all four were judged to require considerable interdisciplinary collaboration to achieve breakthroughs. While the low awareness may be due to the fact that computational diplomacy is currently only being discussed by a small community, as and when it goes mainstream the field could have profound impacts on international relations suggesting there is considerable need for anticipatory planning.

Anticipatory Impact:

Three fundamental questions guide GESDA’s mission and drive its work: Who are we, as humans? How can we all live together? How can we ensure the well-being of humankind and the sustainable future of our planet? We asked researchers from the field to anticipate what impact future breakthroughs could have on each of these dimensions. This wheel summarises their opinions when considering each of these questions, with a higher score indicating high anticipated impact, and vice versa.

  • Anticipated impact on who we are as humans
  • Anticipated impact on how we will all live together
  • Anticipated impact on the well-being of humankind and sustainable future of our planet